CD-ROM Book Text Only Version...
No pictures of graphics were included. They are in the CD-ROM
ADDENDUM

VOLUMN II

1000 Years
of
Barrs Family History

1000 AD to 2000 AD

By

Al Barrs, Jr.

Greenwood, Jackson County,

Florida U.S.A.

32443-1839

© Copyrighted by Al Barrs, Jr. 1999 - 2005 All Rights Reserved.

Revised Fourth Edition October 18, 2005

 

“Your Name”


You got it from your father, it was all he had to give, so it's yours to keep and cherish for as long as you shall live, It was clean the day he got it, and a worthy name to bear, When he got it from his father, there was no dishonor there, So protect and guard it safely, for when all is said and done, You'll be proud the name is spotless when you give it to your son.


Author unknown

WORDS OF WISDOM

I've learned....

that the best classroom in the world is at the feet of an elderly person.

I've learned....

that when you're in love, it shows.

I've learned....

that just one person saying to me, "You've made my day!" makes my day.

I've learned....

that having a child fall asleep in your arms is one of the most peaceful feelings in the world.

I've learned....

that being kind is more important than being right.

I've learned....

that you should never say no to a gift from a child.

I've learned....

that I can always pray for someone when I don't have the strength to help him in some other way.

I've learned....

that no matter how serious your life requires you to be, everyone needs a friend to act goofy with.

I've learned....

that sometimes all a person needs is a hand to hold and a heart to understand.

I've learned....

that simple walks with my father around the block on summer nights when I was a child did wonders for me as an adult.

I've learned....

that life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer it gets to the end, the faster it goes.

I've learned....

that we should be glad God doesn't give us everything we ask for.

I've learned....

that money doesn't buy class.

I've learned....

that it's those small daily happenings that make life so spectacular.

I've learned....

that under everyone's hard shell is someone who wants to be appreciated and loved.

I've learned....

that the Lord didn't do it all in one day. What makes me think I can?

I've learned....

that to ignore the facts does not change the facts.

I've learned....

that when you plan to get even with someone, you are only letting that person continue to hurt you.

I've learned....

that love, not time, heals all wounds.

I've learned....

that the easiest way for me to grow as a person is to surround myself with people smarter than I am.

I've learned....

that everyone you meet deserves to be greeted with a smile

I've learned....

that there's nothing sweeter than sleeping with your babies and feeling their breath on your cheeks.

I've learned....

that no one is perfect until you fall in love with them.

I've learned....

that life is tough, but I'm tougher.

I've learned....

that opportunities are never lost; someone will take the ones you miss.

I've learned....

that when you harbor bitterness, happiness will dock elsewhere.

I've learned....

that I wish I could have told my Mom that I love her one more time before she passed away.

I've learned....

that one should keep his words both soft and tender, because tomorrow he may have to eat them.

I've learned....

that a smile is an inexpensive way to improve your looks.

I've learned....

that I can't choose how I feel, but I can choose what I do about it.

I've learned....

that when your newly born grandchild holds your little finger in his little fist, that you're hooked for life.

I've learned....

that everyone wants to live on top of the mountain, but all the happiness and growth occurs while you're climbing it.

I've learned....

that it is best to give advice in only two circumstances; when it is requested and when it is a life-threatening situation.

I've learned....

that the less time I have to work with, the more things I get done.

Andy Rooney, Author

Contributed by my and Priscilla Lee Jones/Barrs' middle daughter Susan Elaine 1999...Al Barrs

VITAL STATISTICS RECORD FORM

Your full maiden/family name:                            Date/Place of Birth:                                                 

Your residence:                                                   Telephone/E-mail Address:

Father’s name:                                                    Date/Place of Birth:

Mother’s maiden/family name:                            Date/Place of Birth:

Date and place of parent’s:              

  YOUR CHILDREN

#  Sex (M/F) Full Name   Date Born   Where Born   When Married Where   Married to:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

  FAMILY HISTORY INFORMTION/STATISTICS

What do you know about the BARRS family surname?

 

Do you know;

The names of any of your ancestors?                     Names:

What country they came from?

When and how they got to the USA?

What their occupation(s) were?

Which served in the military?

If there is a family cemetery?

Anyone in your family researching BARRS genealogy?

Anyone with a BARRS family bible, old photos, letters, etc?

ADDITIONAL RELATED BARRS INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


SHORT HISTORY OF THE VIKING ERA

 

The Vikings (Norsemen or Northmen) were Germanic people from Scandinavia (Norway, Sweden and Denmark).  After a rapid population growth and conflict among local groups, the Vikings began to raid Western Europe in search of wealth.  The Vikings were a warlike group who worshiped pagan gods. 

 

Between 800 and 1000 AD the Vikings raided villages from Ireland to Russia.   The long, light ships of the Vikings enabled them to attack, plunder, and disappear before the Europeans could organize resistance.


During the 900's the Vikings began to replace raiding with trading.   When the Vikings were at home they were farmers.  The Vikings began to settle in Normandy and England. They converted to Christianity and began to led more peaceful lives.  A warming trend in Europe allowed them to settle and prosper in Iceland and Greenland.  This reduced their need to find new lands for conquest.  

 

Viking poets called skalds recorded their heroic deeds of their warrior leaders. 

Viking Age Timeline:

• In 793 AD the Viking era started with the plundering of the English convent "Lindisfarne".

• Around 850 AD Lothar, son of Louis the Pionus, gave the island Walcheren to Harald & Rorik for protection against his brothers (Charles the Bald and Louis the German) and other Vikings.

• In 878 AD Vikings were "given" Danelagen [Danelaw, also a law] in the Northern most parts of England.

• In 911 AD the Viking "Ganga-Hrolf/Rollo" (Norwegian working for Danes) was "given" Normandie in France, which is named after the Vikings, "men from the north." For protection, Normandy was given by Charles the Simple

• About 1000 AD, Leif Eriksson discovered Vinland, many years after the Native Americans had settled there.

• In 1003 AD Skandinavian Vikings joined "Svein Forkbeard" and in 1013 AD they conquered England.

• 1012 AD Thorkel "The Tall" worked for king Aethelred (protecting London from Svein Forkbeard), they had to flee to Normandie.

• 1014 AD Svein died and his son Knut had to leave for Denmark when Aethelred returned.

• During 1017 AD England was ruled by "Knut the Great," son of "Svein Forkbeard" and then by his son "Harde-Knut" until 1042 AD, when "Harde-Knut" died. (Then the English royals took over with Edward the Confessor)

• On September 26, 1066 AD King Harold II (Last of the Anglo-Saxon Kings) of England beat the invading Norwegian king "Harald Hardradi" at Stamford Bridge.

• On October 14, 1066 AD King Harold II was beaten by "William the Conqueror" in the famous battle of Hastings (A gigantic family feud). William was a Normandic Duke and a descendant of "Rollo".

http://www.yorklibraries.org/services/Virtual%20Voyages/Vikings.htm
 
Who Were the Vikings?

In Norse, Víking means piracy ever since Viking raiders savagely attacked England's Lindisfarne monastery in 793 AD. The Vikings have seemed to have been little more than blue-eyed barbarians in horned helmets. But archeological investigations of Viking sites stretching from Russia to Newfoundland have revealed a more human (if not altogether humane) side to the Viking character.


In an interview with NOVA TV producer Julia Cort, William Fitzhugh, curator of a new exhibit on Vikings at the Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, offers compelling insight into this new image of the Norsemen and what he perceives as their catalytic role in Europe's transformation from a feudal society to an integrated group of modern nation-states.

NOVA: What must it have been like for the monks at Lindisfarne to be suddenly attacked out of the blue?

 

Fitzhugh: For them, the attack represented the vengeance of Satan on the Christian outposts of Europe. It was a terrible event, because the monks and the church centers had set themselves up in small, fortress-like places where they could pursue their studies and writings in peace, and it was an invasion of the sanctities of Christ and their religion. This was totally unlike anything that had happened before. There had been outlaws, but to have shiploads of brawny characters show up at your isolated, supposedly sacred center, this was the ultimate horror.

 

NOVA: What did the Vikings actually do in these attacks?

 

Fitzhugh: Well, the attacks were very diverse. I mean, one misconception we have is that swarms of Vikings raided constantly all over the place, and it really wasn't that way. For the most part, the raids were totally independent. They were not the result of national armies or navies moving down into Europe, but rather the actions of individual Viking chieftains who grouped together followers and had one or maybe several boats.

 

Occasionally, as in some of the invasions of Normandy, they organized whole flotillas and made a purposeful kind of attack, but generally they were much more individualistic. They had to find food, and they couldn't carry their food with them.

 

They had to live off the land, so they drove people out and took whatever money and other valuables people had. And, of course, the church centers and monasteries like Lindisfarne constituted the major sources of wealth at that time.

 

NOVA: Did they kill a lot of people in these raids?

 

Fitzhugh: In many cases they did. I think they were relatively ruthless, but remember, this was a ruthless age with far more than just peaceful farmers living peaceful lives. All sorts of things were going on in the British Isles and mainland Europe, including constant battles between rival princes vying for kingship and control of local regions. The Vikings were just another crowd, though a crowd that was non-Christian and had no compunction about killing churchmen or women or children.

 

That said, in general I think the victims were men, because the Vikings were great at absorbing people. They needed slaves. They needed people to row their boats. They needed people to help maintain their lifestyle. They regularly set up small villages and centers where they could over-winter or stay for months at a time, and they needed people to help run these establishments. So

 

I think if you were able to put yourself back into the camp of a raiding Viking group, you probably would find Italians and Spaniards and Portuguese and French and Russians -- a very diverse group built around a core of Vikings from a particular region, say, southern Denmark or an Oslo fjord. It wouldn't be just be blond, blue-eyed Norsemen.

 

NOVA: So what are the main challenges in finding the truth about the Vikings?

 

Fitzhugh: Well, one of the major problems in Viking studies is that we're biased towards the historical accounts -- early chronicles that all came from the church centers or official reports to the kings or regional authorities. It's always been that way. Only in the past 20 years or so have archeological and other studies begun to provide information that fleshes out and in some cases contradicts or even replaces the historical record. These findings are giving us a totally different view of the Vikings.

 

We see them archeologically not as raiders and pillagers but as entrepreneurs, traders, people opening up new avenues of commerce, bringing new materials into Scandinavia, spreading Scandinavian ideas into Europe. For instance, we see silk that originated in Asia appearing in archeological sites such as that at York (see The Viking Diaspora). This view contrasts sharply with the early accounts, which were all from Europe, were inevitably based on victims' reports, and were extremely one-sided.

Who Were the Vikings?

NOVA: Are the Icelandic sagas as unreliable?

 

Fitzhugh: The Icelandic sagas are phenomenal documents that for hundreds of years provided everything we knew about the Vikings. If we were interested in Vinland [the Viking name for a far-off land they visited, which scholars now believe is eastern Canada in and around Newfoundland. But then, beginning with the discovery of Viking burial ships a century ago, archeology started to poke its nose into Viking affairs, and today, excavations have become an invaluable new source of information. Scholars have gone back to the sagas and asked, "How much of this is history? How much fabrication? How much, just the elaboration of family storytelling?"

 

Current saga scholarship is wonderful, because it's giving us a lot of insights as to why the sagas are the way they are. The sagas were compiled in the 13th century and later based on stories that originated as early as 400 or 500 years before that. This is a long time for an oral tradition to be handed down. Even the Vinland sagas, which chronicle events around A.D. 1000, were not recorded for a couple of hundred years after that. Some now believe the sagas are basically family stories relating the ancestry, say, of Erik or of Gudrid and her family. But archeology is actually proving that a lot of these stories have a good basis in fact, so much so that Helge Ingstad could use them to find the L'Anse aux Meadows site [an archeological site in Newfoundland believed to have been a Viking settlement established hundreds of years before Columbus "discovered" America].

 

NOVA: Why did they abandon L'Anse aux Meadows?

 

Fitzhugh: Well, I think after a few years of using L'Anse aux Meadows as a staging area, the Vikings simply found it untenable in terms of supporting a sizeable group in that new environment. Too far from home and too many dangers. We know from the sagas that they lost people, and they probably lost ships.

 

L'Anse aux Meadows reached a point where it had to move beyond the exploration phase to the settlement phase, and that was not possible.

 

We have to remember that this was in the early days of the Greenland colony, which had only a small number of settlers itself, and to have so much of its resources directed toward a perilous new enterprise was not sensible. So I think the sagas are probably correct when they say, "It's a beautiful, rich land, but we can't defend ourselves in it."

 

NOVA: But this wasn't the end of the Norse in North America, right?

 

Fitzhugh: No. We've seen as a result of archaeological research large amounts of Viking material turning up in Native sites in the Arctic regions of North America.

 

This material dates to perhaps as much as 300 years after the initial Vinland voyages. We seem to have a time period that began with the Vinland contact episode, explorations and so forth, and then after the society in Greenland got rolling and people were settled, walrus-ivory trade with Europe started to be really important. Probably more than any other factor, this stimulated the continuous Western orientation of the Greenland Norse, not only up into the Greenland walrus-hunting territories but across the Davis Strait to Ellesmere and Baffin islands and south into Labrador. These are areas where the Vikings were exploring and trading, and where native populations were trading Viking materials through their own trade networks. Of course, the continuing need for wood in treeless Greenland prompted return visits to Markland, which we know to have been today's Labrador.

 

NOVA: And what happened to the Greenland colonies?

 

Fitzhugh: There are lots of different theories. This is a wonderful area of exploration in terms of archeological and historical theory, because we have environmental changes, we have growing human population. We have an important economic and climactic downturn. You see a society that is reaching a peak and then just maintaining itself, but all the forces are going against it after 1300 or so. The western colony disappears around 1350. The eastern settlement continues for another century, but it seems not to be doing too well, and then it just drops off the line. The last historic record is from 1408, a church wedding of Hvalsey.

 

There are also theories of pirates and other kinds of trauma that may have occurred in these settlements. All in all, I think we have here a real human experience.

 

This is not the wrath of God coming down and it's not an Ice Age descending. When pondering this extinction story, one has to consider a multiplicity of factors.

 

NOVA: What contributed to the end of the Viking age itself?

 

Fitzhugh: The end probably came about as a result of tired Vikings who had become citizens of many places in Europe. They had become Christians back in their homelands, kings had evolved and were instituting taxes, and the economy had become such that you could get along much better as a trader rather than as a raider. The force of Viking onslaughts had caused European kingdoms to become centralized and focused. They had basically gotten their act together, learning how to defend themselves and to gain by trading and negotiating with the Vikings rather than just trying to fight them.

 

NOVA: What was it about the Vikings or what they did that made it so easy for them to assimilate into foreign cultures?

 

Fitzhugh: I think the Vikings were very adaptive. They learned to take advantage of whatever situation they found themselves in. When they settled in Europe, they took farmlands, yes, but they also met new people; they took slaves, but the slaves became part of their families. Their languages were not that different; they were all Germanic-based languages. (Many of the place-names in the British Isles, in fact, date from Viking times.) And the Vikings were not on a special crusade. They weren't trying to bring paganism to Europe. Quite the opposite, in fact: They were receiving influences from a Europe that they saw as somehow technologically and maybe in some ways politically superior. They weren't out to kill everyone in the countryside but rather to find a way to live, to set up shop, and I think they just readily mixed in.

 

NOVA: In the end, what do you feel was the Vikings' greatest impact on the world?

 

Fitzhugh: I think that without question it was reconnecting humanity, making the world a smaller place by traveling huge distances, connecting peoples from Baghdad to Scandinavia to southern Europe to the north Atlantic to the mainland of North America.

 

From a social or economic or religious point of view, no matter what you think of it, the Viking period was a kind of hinge in European history. It was the time from which you went from early history and classical civilization into what we know as modern Europe and a modern world, in which people are exchanging ideas and moving around rapidly and exploring new frontiers, looking for new resources and new connections.       - 15 -

 

When we look into the future now, I think we implicitly look back to the Vikings as the origin of this kind of human endeavor to find new horizons, go new places, use new technology, meet new people, think new thoughts.

 

In a millennium era as we're in now, this is the inspiration of the Vikings: It's not only the historical impact that they had on Europe and in discovering the North American continent for the first time. These things are interesting and important, but I think that we should look at the Vikings in a broader sense, as a kind of a human myth come true that we can draw on -- that is, we can look to space, to the oceans, to explorations among our own peoples, finding new ways of getting along, mixing, and sharing.

Secrets of Norse Ships by Evan Hadingham

For three turbulent centuries, the glimpse of a square sail and dragon-headed prow on the horizon struck terror into the hearts of medieval Europeans. Indeed, the Viking Age, from A.D. 800-1100, was the age of the sleek, speedy longship.

 

Without this crucial advance in ship technology, the Vikings would never have become a dominant force in medieval warfare, politics, and trade.
 

The drekar, or dragon-headed longships, were stealthy troop carriers. They could cross the open oceans under sail and then switch to oars for lightning-fast hit-and-run attacks on undefended towns and monasteries. Far surpassing contemporary English or Frankish vessels in lightness and efficiency, longships carried Viking raiders from northern England to North Africa.

 

Viking expertise in naval craftsmanship soon led to the evolution of other types of ship. Among these were the knarr, or ocean-going cargo vessel, which facilitated far-flung trade networks and the colonization of Iceland, Greenland, and America. The knarr drew on similar design principles as the longship but was higher and wider in relation to its length and had only limited numbers of oars to assist with maneuvers in narrow channels. Cargo decks were installed fore and aft.

 

Proof in the planking

The secret of the Viking ship lay in its unique construction. Using a broad ax rather than a saw, expert woodworkers would first split oak tree trunks into long, thin planks. They then fastened the boards with iron nails to a single sturdy keel and then to each other, one plank overlapping the next. The Vikings gave shape to the hull using this "clinker" technique rather than the more conventional method of first building an inner skeleton for the hull.

Next, the boat builders affixed evenly spaced floor timbers to the keel and not to the hull; this insured resilience and flexibility. They then added crossbeams to provide a deck and rowing benches, and secured a massive beam along the keel to support the mast.

 

The longships' light, economic construction was a major factor behind their success. Modern replicas have achieved speeds of up to 14 knots. In marked contrast to modern sailboats, the ships' lack of a big, vertical keel meant that they were highly maneuverable and could easily penetrate shallow surf and river estuaries. Seafarers steered using a single side rudder on the right, the 'starboard' or "steering board" side.

 

(The term 'starboard' is thought to have originated in the Viking era.) They could also reef the square sails in strong winds and adjust them to permit rapid tacking.

 

Preserved to the present

Famous discoveries of Viking ships at Gokstad and Oseberg, Norway, in 1880 and 1906, respectively, established the classic image of the dragon-headed warship. Longships from both sites were preserved almost intact, with lavish carved decoration, in the waterlogged clay of royal burial mounds. Built around A.D. 890, three quarters of a century after the Oseberg ship, the Gokstad vessel shows great improvements in design, particularly in the sturdiness of the mast supports. Not surprisingly, this era, during which the Norse perfected longship design, coincides with the eruption of seaborn Viking raids on the monasteries and towns of Europe.

The modern phase of Viking ship investigation began with the recovery of five vessels at Skuldelev in Roskilde fjord, Denmark, between 1957 and 1962. The excavation involved building a cofferdam around the ships, which Norsemen deliberately sunk in a desperate bid to barricade the fjord against invaders.

 

The major revelation at Skuldelev was the variety of the vessels, which ranged from a stocky cargo ship with a capacity of 24 tons to two sleek longships. The larger of the longships, measuring 95 feet in length, had made at least one successful crossing of the North Sea, for tree-ring analysis of its oak timbers revealed that they had been cut down around A.D. 1060-70 near Dublin, suggesting the presence of a major shipyard at this key Viking stronghold in Ireland.

 

Even more remarkable discoveries were to follow in 1996, when contractors began expanding Roskilde's waterfront museum, originally built to house the finds from Skuldelev. As astonishing as it sounds, no fewer than nine wrecked medieval ships eventually turned up in different spots around the building site, including one under the museum's car park.

The Viking Diaspora
From the eighth to the eleventh centuries, the Vikings, comprising mainly Danes and Norwegians, shot around the Northern Hemisphere, plundering vast swaths of territory with the rapacity of a Genghis Khan. The Norsemen raided throughout the British Isles and the Frankish empire, and even attacked North Africa. They headed west to Iceland, Greenland, and what is now Canada, becoming the first Europeans to set foot in the Americas.

And they traveled east into what is now northern Russia, ultimately lending their own name Rus, the Slavs' name for them, to that great country.

Physical and social traces of the Vikings' lightning-like passing remain in sites stretching from Newfoundland to north Russia. On the map at left, click on Norse sites and get a feel for the sheer breadth of the Viking diaspora.

York
Viking capital of the Danelaw or Scandinavian territory, first occupied in 866 AD. Excavations have revealed dozens of Viking Age houses and workshops.

Early Germanic tribes of northern Europe were first to develop runes, but the Scandinavians soon adopted the symbols for their own use. When the seafaring Vikings traveled to faraway lands, they brought their system of writing with them, leaving runic inscriptions in places as distant as Greenland.

 

Wherever they went, Vikings turned to runes to express both the poetic ("Listen, ring-bearers, while I speak/Of the glories in war of Harald, most wealthy") and the prosaic ("Rannvieg owns this box"), inscribing them on everything from great stone monuments to common household items.

 

Learn your F-U-TH's

The runic alphabet, or Futhark, gets its name from its first six sounds (f, u, th, a, r, k), much like the word 'alphabet' derives from the first two letters of the Greek alphabet, alpha and beta. Each rune not only represents a phonetic sound but also has its own distinct meaning often connected with Norse mythology. Scholars believe that early peoples used the runes originally as a means of communication and only later for magical purposes.

Historians disagree on when runes first came into use. Since the first objects inscribed with runes date to the second and third centuries A.D., some surmise that the runic alphabet arose during the first century A.D. Scholars concur that runes grew out of an earlier alphabet, but which one is unclear. A likely candidate is the Etruscan alphabet. Many argue that the geographic proximity of the Etruscans, who lived in northern Italy, to the Germanic tribes of northern Europe makes it likely that these two groups had some form of cultural exchange. Also, similarities exist in some letterforms of the Etruscan and runic alphabets. Another possibility for a source alphabet is Latin. Those who subscribe to this theory believe that the numerous commercial contacts between the Germanic tribes and the Roman Empire during the first century A.D. exposed the former to the Latin alphabet. The Northerners may have simply borrowed the Roman letters and adapted them to their needs.

 

The Scandinavians had their own explanation for the appearance of the runes. According to legend, Odin, chief of the Norse gods, speared himself to a tree in a self-sacrificial attempt to receive occult knowledge. As he hung suspended for nine windy nights, he learned the mysteries of the runes, which he then passed on to his people. Since Nordic peoples believed the runic script to be a gift from Odin, they treated it with great reverence. Belief in the divine origin of the runes also contributed to the idea that runes possessed magical powers.

 

Meet the Rune Master

Those who used them for magic took the supernatural powers of the runes seriously. As one Viking poet put it, "Let no man carve runes to cast a spell, save first he learns to read them well."

While many in the upper classes could read and write runes, the Vikings called in a specialist when dealing with the talismanic properties of their alphabet.

These experts, called Rune Masters, were specially trained to bring runes into play for divination and sorcery.

Judging from the many poems and legends chronicling their feats, the Rune Masters held positions of great importance in the Viking world. In one tale, a woman becomes deathly ill due to the bungling of an amateur Rune Master. The sorcerer carves a runic formula into a whale's bone, which the woman then hangs over her bed. The inscription is meant to protect her, but because it bears the wrong runes, it makes her sick. Another Rune Master corrects the runes, and the woman immediately recovers. In another story, a Rune Master inscribes protective runic symbols on his drinking horn. When a rival attempts to poison his drink, the drinking horn breaks in two. Thanks to his knowledge of the runes, the Rune Master saves his own life.

 

Rune Masters were also skilled in the art of rune casting, a method of divination. In one common rune-casting technique, the diviner carved runes on pieces of bark, then flung the pieces on the ground, picked three at random, and used the symbols inscribed on them to answer his client's question. Alternatively, the Rune Master painted runes on flat pebbles. He then placed the pebbles in a leather bag, shook the bag, and cast the pebbles onto the ground. Runes that landed face up served for the divination.

 

Viking warriors harnessed the arcane powers of the runes even in war. Runic inscriptions on swords entreated the gods either to protect the sword's owner or bring pain and misery to his enemy. The berserkers, whose reckless behavior on the battlefield gave rise to the word 'beserk,' may owe their reputation in part to the runes. These warriors customarily carved the runic symbol for Tyr, the god of war, onto their shields. They would then charge fearlessly into battle, in the belief that nothing could overcome the power of the runes.

 

Raise a runestone

The magical met the mundane in the runestones -- large, freestanding rocks or boulders inscribed with runes. Runestones which served as memorials to the dead often bore thaumaturgical formulas meant to ease the dead person's passage into the next world. But these monuments had a pragmatic purpose as well: documenting how much land the deceased had owned and listing relatives who would likely inherit that person's estate.

One such dual-purpose runestone was put up by "Kaufi and Autir, they erected this stone in memory of Tumi, their brother who owned Gusnava [a Swedish village]." Kaufi and Autir erected their runestone both to honor their brother and to make perfectly clear who owned Gusnava after his death.

Although most runestones honor men, some commemorated Viking women. One runestone found in Norway honors "Gunnvor, Thryrik's daughter, [who] built a bridge in memory of her daughter Astrid. She was the handiest girl in Hadeland." Some runestones also celebrated the achievements of the living. In one example, Jarlabanki, builder of the famous Jarlabanki causeway in 11th-century Sweden, erected a group of runestones to aggrandize himself for his contributions to the community.

 

Even with the advent of Christianity in the north, runes continued to appear on coffins, gravestones, and monuments, often side-by-side with more traditional Christian symbols. Like many of their contemporaries, the Norsemen Sven and Thorgot, who raised a runestone "in memory of Manni and Sveni; may God help their souls," had no problem using pagan symbols to replace the usual "may Thor hallow these Runes" with an appeal to the Christian God.

 

The Norsemen continued the practice of mixing runes with Christian symbols until the 17th century, when the medieval church banned runes in an attempt to drive out all vestiges of superstition, paganism, and magic. Runes fell out of widespread use but did not disappear altogether, and in recent times the Vikings' enigmatic alphabet has had a resurgence at the hands of everyone from Nazis to New Agers.


During the Viking Age, from 750-1050 AD Viking influence covered a huge expanse, reaching from the Caspian Sea in the east and the Mediterranean in the south, throughout Northern Europe, across the Atlantic, and touched the homelands of diverse native groups in Eastern North America.

 

In addition to being the fierce warriors of popular stereotype, Vikings were master craftsman, shrewd businessman, and fearless explorers. Their activities stimulated political changes in Europe and Russia; created lasting new societies in Iceland and Greenland; and led to the discovery of North America 500 years before Columbus. Now, at the turn of the new millennium, we invite you to follow in their wake!

http://www.yorklibraries.org/services/Virtual%20Voyages/Vikings.htm


11th Cavalry Georgia State Guard

In service to Georgia and the

Confederate States of America (CSA)

A Partial Regimental History

NOTE: For the entire history go to http://members.xoom.com/jagriffin/JAG.htm

NOTE: James C. Barrs and his oldest son, James Henry L. Barrs and brother William W. Barrs enlisted in the 11th Cavalry Georgia State Guard in 1863 and after James and his son returning to their home in Tallokas District in north Brooks County Georgia from the Wakulla County Florida Salt Works. Tallokas is north of the Nankin District. James M. Barrs, a 1st cousin of James C. Barrs was born to Dempsey Barrs in 1829 in Twiggs County Georgia.  James M. enlisted on March 14, 1862 at the CSA Camp Anderson. He was discharged August 27, 1863 and was 5'9" dark skin and hair, blue eyes, occupation Farmer. James M. Barrs enlisted in "The Wakulla Tigers" in July of 1863 and was wounded in the Battle of Gettysburg on July 2, 1863. Brothers James C. and William W. Barrs served in the Brooks County GA Home Guard, which became the 81 Battalion. Note: Many early Barrs had blue eyes, as did my father Fonso Barrs. Scandinavians and Vikings did and do also!


NOTE:
In Sikafis Compendium of Confederate Armies-South Carolina and Georgia, this regiment is listed as #185 11th Georgia Infantry-State Guard. This is probably because Captain MacIntyre was in command of a State Guard Infantry Battalion (69th Georgia Militia) and in the summer of 1863 because of a man power shortage, it was changed to a Cavalry regiment. To further expand on the origins of this unit these notes on their officers prior assignments are given: Maclntyre's Battalion, Georgia State Guards, A. T. MacIntyre, Maj., Decatur Squadron, Georgia State Guards: Patrick A. McGriff, Capt., and a company appears to have served in an independent company of infantry and rolls have been so filed. It is believed the regiment was mustered out by spring of 1864.

*James C. , James Henry L. and William W. Barrs' commanding officers are in bold print

Field and Staff

Colonel: Archibald Thompson MacIntyre
Lieutenant Colonel: William Godfrey
Major: Patrick A. McGriff

Companies and Officers
Officers of Company D-Brooks' Cavalry

Captain: Wiley W. Groover *
1st Lieutenant: Asa Kemp
2nd Lieutenant: C. E. Groover
2nd Lieutenant: L. R. Edmondson

Stationed at Quitman in 1863

August 4, 1863:  Company muster-in roll of Captain Wiley W. Groover's Company, in the Battalion Regiment commanded by Major MacIntyre, called into the service of the Confederate States for local defense under the provisions of the Act of Congress on requisition of the President by Joseph E. Brown, Governor of Georgia, from August 4, 1863 (date of this muster) for the term of six months, unless sooner discharged, and to serve in the southwestern quarter of the state of Georgia, and west of the Altamaha River. (This is when, where and the unit James C. Barrs, his  son and brother enlisted after returning from the Wakulla County, Florida Salt Works.) The 3 Barrs served in the same company, company “D”.

I certify, on honor, that I have carefully examined the men whose names are borne on this roll, their horses and equipments, and have accepted them into the service of the Confederate States for the term of six months from August 4, 1863. B. W. SINCLAIR, Colonel, Eighty-first Regiment, Georgia Militia, Mustering Officer

Again adding to the confusion in researching this regiment, the 11th of Colonel McIntyre is referred to as Infantry. We researching this unit, it is advised to look at all information that can be found on any regiment bearing the 11th designation for State Guard or Militia regardless if it states infantry or cavalry.

 

General Information on the Georgia State Guard

The need for Governor Brown to call up a State Guard, Militia, Home Guard, Georgia Troops or other designation of troops raised to defend Georgia (which separates them from regular troops raised from Georgia for Confederate Service) was because of the invasion of the state.  As Federal troops under General Rosecrans were pushing into Georgia in September 1863, and until their defeat at Chickamauga.  Georgia State Guard regiments were called to duty in the Confederate army's rear. From that point until they mustered out on or about 4 February 1864, the State Guard outfits helped garrison Savannah and other places.  The siege of Northern Georgia and Atlanta in 1864 was an emergency that unfortunately, allowed little in the way of formal record keeping.  Many of the men, who fought in Militia and Home Guard units, remain unrecognized for their services.  Some are listed in the military records.

 

The only way to find out about such service is often through family oral histories, county histories, obituaries, and newspaper accounts of the time. It is estimated that about 5000 of these men fought in the trenches around Atlanta for a couple of months, then saw extended field service against Sherman's march of devastation and destruction across Georgia.  Some were captured when Fort McAllister Georgia was over run by superior numbers of General Sherman's troops. (James C. Barrs was among the CSA soldiers captured by attacking Union troops at Fort McAllister Georgia.)

 

A large proportion of the officers and men in all the reserve regiments and battalions were exempts from the regular Confederate service, many of them having been honorably discharged on account of wounds or failing health; many others were employees in government workshops, and some were State and county officers, while still others were either too old or too young for the regular service or had occupation beneficial to the CSA.

 

And, some like James C. Barrs were exempt because of their operating of the valued Salt Works of the Gulf of Mexico cost, which they operated until destroyed by Union gunboats and Marines.

 

Fortunately Confederate Military History has been preserved in the following information on the Georgia State Guard and Reserves.

 

More on the 11th Georgia State Guard

The 11th Georgia State Guard is only a month old when the need for a strong defensive posture in North Georgia, particularly Atlanta was seen. Special Orders #213 established General Cobb as the general officer in charge of organizing the Georgia men in what became a desperate attempt to thwart the invading army of Union General Sherman.

 

The headquarters of the Georgia State Guard in the autumn of 1863 was near Atlanta Georgia as evidenced by this correspondence.  The Official Records list the 11th Georgia State Guard as being camped near Savannah Georgia under command of General Henry R. Jackson.

 

CONFEDERATE CORRESPONDENCE, ORDERS, AND RETURNS RELATING TO OPERATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA AND FLORIDA, AND ON THE GEORGIA COAST, FROM JANUARY 1 TO FEBRUARY 29, 1864  - # GEORGIA STATE TROOPS at Savannah Brig. Gen. HENRY R. JACKSON 11th Georgia State Guard, Col. A. T. McIntyre.

 

Governor Brown made his appeal to the remaining men in Georgia to take up arms to protect themselves, their homes and families against the invading Yankee army. This call underscores the desperate situation facing the people of Georgia and the Confederacy.

 

Confederate Correspondence, Orders, And Returns Relating To Operations In Southwestern Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, West Florida, And Northern Georgia.- #27 HEADQUARTERS GEORGIA MILITIA, Atlanta, GA, May 28, 1864.

 

TO THE PEOPLE OF GEORGIA:

Your State is invaded and a portion of its most valuable territory overrun by a vindictive enemy of great strength, who is lying waste and devastating the country behind him. Unless this force is checked speedily, the property and homes of thousands must be destroyed, and they driven out as wanderers in destitution and beggary.

Our noble army needs further re-enforcements until the emergency has passed. I have summoned the civil and military officers of the State to arms, and they are promptly and nobly responding. If any of those who are subject to militia duty are remaining at home, who are able to do service, I desire the old men to report the facts to me immediately, that courts-martial may be ordered, or other proper steps taken to compel them to do their duty, or suffer the penalties. When all the officers shall have responded, more men will still be needed.

I do not order out the reserve militia except at the most exposed points, because some must be left at home to make bread; and the old men from fifty to sixty and the boys under seventeen are not able, as a general rule, to endure hard service in the military field. But I do call upon all who are able for service, and can possibly be spared from home, to hasten to the field till the great battle is fought. Many have Confederate contracts, details, and exemptions who are stout and able to do military duty, and can go to the field for a time without serious detriment to the public interest. All such, with all others able for duty, are earnestly requested to fly to arms as the State officers have done. Let each report to General Wayne, at Atlanta, and bring with him a bed quilt or blanket and rations to last him to camp, and a good double-barreled shotgun if he has one. If not, he can be armed by the Government.

Georgians, we are now in the crisis of our fate. The destiny of our posterity for ages to come may hang upon the results of the next few days. He who remains at his home now will soon occupy it as a slave, or be driven from it.

Rally to the rescue, and till the danger is past let the watchword of every patriot be, "To arms, and to the front;" and the vandal hordes will soon be driven back. JOSEPH E. BROWN.

General Sherman prepares to further push his invasion into Georgia with 100,000 Federal troops. Sherman gloats at the misery and destruction he is causing in Georgia as seen in a memo to General Grant

 

UNION CORRESPONDENCE, ORDERS, AND RETURNS RELATING TO OPERATIONS IN THE ATLANTA CAMPAIGN, FROM JULY 1, 1864, TO SEPTEMBER 8, 1864: #5 HDQRS. MILITARY DIVISION OF THE MISSISSIPPI, In the Field, near Chattahoochee River, July 12, 1864. Lieutenant-General GRANT, Near Petersburg, VA: